Declare Books In Favor Of Orthodoxy
Original Title: | Orthodoxy |
ISBN: | 160096527X (ISBN13: 9781600965272) |
Edition Language: | English |
G.K. Chesterton
Paperback | Pages: 168 pages Rating: 4.18 | 29583 Users | 1647 Reviews
Point About Books Orthodoxy
Title | : | Orthodoxy |
Author | : | G.K. Chesterton |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 168 pages |
Published | : | July 30th 2008 by Waking Lion Press (first published 1908) |
Categories | : | Religion. Theology. Christian. Nonfiction. Christianity. Philosophy. Classics |
Explanation Toward Books Orthodoxy
This book is meant to be a companion to "Heretics," and to put the positive side in addition to the negative. Many critics complained of the book because it merely criticised current philosophies without offering any alternative philosophy. This book is an attempt to answer the challenge. It is the purpose of the writer to attempt an explanation, not of whether the Christian Faith can be believed, but of how he personally has come to believe it. The book is therefore arranged upon the positive principle of a riddle and its answer. It deals first with all the writer's own solitary and sincere speculations and then with the startling style in which they were all suddenly satisfied by the Christian Theology. The writer regards it as amounting to a convincing creed. But if it is not that it is at least a repeated and surprising coincidence.Rating About Books Orthodoxy
Ratings: 4.18 From 29583 Users | 1647 ReviewsArticle About Books Orthodoxy
The title belies the true depth and value of this book. Chesterton writes, ostensibly, to share his own conclusions about why Christianity is true and worth following. But the book is so much bigger than that, just as it is so much more intimate than a mere treatise on orthodoxy. Chesterton offers clarity of thought and imagination and wit. Every single page offers something interesting and new to chew on. Ill be returning to this one over and over."Things can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is false, but nothing can be irrelevant to the proposition that Christianity is true." Certainly nothing is irrelevant to discussing Christianity when G.K. Chesterton writes a classic apologetics work. Orthodoxy is and is not a typical apologetics work. It defends the orthodox Christian world-view and it moreover discusses and reveals what Chesterton's own views and values were. As such Chesterton does not back away from discussing
I read this at a time in my life when I was not receptive to it, too full of modern theologians to get Chesterton's meanings. It is still on my shelf, and will get another reading in time, in this world of the next.
I learned that the Orthodoxy of the Catholic faith is what keeps it (and the world) sane. It calls to us from our fairy tales while at the same time appealing to our logic.I also learned why so many people, like C.S. Lewis, Scott Hahn, and J.R.R. Tolkien have made reference to G.K. Chesterton - he is brilliant. His mastery of the English language is second to none.The only difficulty of this book is that it may come off as "high-brow" because it was written in the U.K. (and their English is
I first read this in 1975. It was a life-saver then. Not sure how many times I have read it since, but Nancy and I just finished reading it aloud together (May 2013). Fantastic, as always.
See here for a chapter-by-chapter sketch of an audio version I listened to in 2020.Available online. See Plodcast, Episode #7 and Episode #18.My first Chesterton book. It was slow-going for the first few chapters, but I enjoyed it more as I went on. This book has come up again and again, and I really need to read through it again. Having interacted with it on a deeper level since the first time I read it, I think that I'd give it five stars if I read it again.Here's Piper on why Chesterton's
It is with extreme reluctance that I condemn this work as worthless. The person who recommended it to me is one whose opinion and learning I respect greatly.Chesterton seems to think (although I'm not entirely sure of anything in this book, inasmuch as the author refuses to write in anything but figurative language and metaphor. In fact, the term "mixed metaphor" is an entirely inappropriate descriptor. One would need to use exponents to keep track of the metaphors and smilies that he heaps upon
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.