Particularize Containing Books The Edible Woman
| Title | : | The Edible Woman |
| Author | : | Margaret Atwood |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 310 pages |
| Published | : | June 1998 by Anchor (first published December 31st 1969) |
| Categories | : | Fiction. Feminism. Cultural. Canada. Classics. Literary Fiction. Contemporary. Novels |
Margaret Atwood
Paperback | Pages: 310 pages Rating: 3.68 | 28668 Users | 1654 Reviews
Explanation Conducive To Books The Edible Woman
Marian is determined to be ordinary. She lays her head gently on the shoulder of her serious fiancé and quietly awaits marriage. But she didn't count on an inner rebellion that would rock her stable routine, and her digestion. Marriage à la mode, Marian discovers, is something she literally can't stomach...The Edible Woman is a funny, engaging novel about emotional cannibalism, men and women, and the desire to be consumed.
Details Books Concering The Edible Woman
| Original Title: | The Edible Woman |
| ISBN: | 0385491069 (ISBN13: 9780385491068) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Characters: | Marian McAlpin, Ainsley Tewce, Peter Wollander |
| Setting: | Toronto, Ontario(Canada) |
Rating Containing Books The Edible Woman
Ratings: 3.68 From 28668 Users | 1654 ReviewsCommentary Containing Books The Edible Woman
before Ohhh this book is like my favorite hoodiethreadbare and falling apart but so so soft and comfy, with all those little stains and patches as sweet reminders of long ago. Love love love love this book...after Well yes, I do love this book as much as ever, but I was actually kind of surprised at how different it was from the last time I read it, oh, five or six years ago. Here are some reflections (in list form, because I'm feeling lazy):1. I am still terribly and utterly in love with4 and a half star, rounded to 4.Marriage, consumerism, misogyny, dark humour, clever (albeit not super subtle) symbolism. This was Margaret Atwoods first published novel and if you have read any of her other work, you can immediately see how she sharpened her claws with The Edible Woman. The same motifs appear in her other books I have read (namely The Handmaids Tale, The Blind Assassin, Cats Eye and The Robber Bride), and I can now see where she planted the seeds that would grow into some of
A novel with a major, very creepy power. Very different from her latter books, "The Edible Woman" is about the destructive power of man-woman relationships and it takes place in a world of robotic emotions and mechanical compulsions (not too far off from the Victorian variety!). The novel, a true avantgarde sociosexual depiction, borrows its demonic tone from Hawthorne, its cinematography from Cronenberg, its absurdism from David Lynch. Also, it contains all the brilliance & pseudo-silliness
I don't think I could have read "The Edible Woman" at a better time than now, when topics of feminism are becoming more and more present. I originally picked up this book because of its title and because I wanted to check out some Atwood--admittedly, this is my first time reading her. The title alone has so many implications--that women are consumable, visceral, sinewy, sexual, and all of the above. The main character is so honest and real that I often forgot throughout the book that she was
The first book I read by Margaret Atwood in the mid-eighties and the one that made me a fan. I had never read anything quite like it before and I was hooked.
Written in 1965, this is a protofeminist work that anticipated second wave feminism in North America - and it is important to keep that in mind when reading it, because fortunately, some aspects seem outdated for today's readers; unfortunately though, other aspects are still upsettingly relevant. Discussing gender stereotypes and consumerism, the story is told from the perspective of Marian, a young woman who works for a market research company and slowly loses her sense of self after getting
On to my quest to read more Margaret Atwood, I hit my first obstacle. I cant say it was a bad book, I enjoyed the character but I did not enjoy the story. Why? Because there wasnt much of it. Instead, this book was a commentary about femininity. I could call it a feminist novel but as Margaret herself says in the foreword of this book she wrote it before the movement even started. Its sad how much of what the character of this book has to deal with in the book is still just as relevant and
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.